smartyEscape("When a government entity outsources IT projects, consideration must be given early in the project to potential disputes and/or litigation with other parties, particularly third-party vendors, the public-at-large, and other parts of the supply chain. In this case, the State contracted for the Colorado Benefits Management System (CBMS) and the counties throughout the state were expected to deliver client services using the new system. The public expected transparency of government reporting while the State focused on accountability measures of the CBMS project. We use Agency Theory to help explain why certain public expectations were not initially met by CBMS and how some of these “disconnects” could have been avoided. Since the State, IT vendors, the public, and counties have different goals, risk preferences, and information needs, they used different measures to evaluate any government IT project. These mismatched measurements help explain the cause of any unmet expectations that can lead to disputes and/or litigation. We found that the State and IT vendors evaluated this IT project using more process-based accountability measures while the public and counties evaluated the project more with outcome-based measures. Therefore, we recommend that the State and IT vendors should emphasize both outcome-based and process-based measures in order to be more transparent when designing and implementing IT projects. The Colorado Benefits Management System (CBMS) provides an interesting case study showing how Agency Theory can be applied to a governmental IT project and how different measurements used by the State, IT vendors, the public, and counties contributed to the tension and turmoil experienced while implementing CBMS.") File: D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\lib\pkp\lib\smarty\Smarty.class.php line 1869 Function: include("D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\cache\t_compile\mpgTheme^%%28^280^280EE005%%dublincore.tpl.php") File: D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\lib\pkp\classes\template\PKPTemplateManager.inc.php line 211 Function: Smarty->_smarty_include(Array(2)) File: D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\cache\t_compile\mpgTheme^%%35^350^3508C2FA%%header.tpl.php line 33 Function: PKPTemplateManager->_smarty_include(Array(2)) File: D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\lib\pkp\lib\smarty\Smarty.class.php line 1869 Function: include("D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\cache\t_compile\mpgTheme^%%35^350^3508C2FA%%header.tpl.php") File: D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\lib\pkp\classes\template\PKPTemplateManager.inc.php line 211 Function: Smarty->_smarty_include(Array(2)) File: D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\cache\t_compile\mpgTheme^%%38^38D^38D7420B%%article.tpl.php line 6 Function: PKPTemplateManager->_smarty_include(Array(2)) File: D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\lib\pkp\lib\smarty\Smarty.class.php line 1256 Function: include("D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\cache\t_compile\mpgTheme^%%38^38D^38D7420B%%article.tpl.php") File: D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\lib\pkp\classes\template\PKPTemplateManager.inc.php line 296 Function: Smarty->fetch("article/article.tpl", Null, Null, True) File: D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\lib\pkp\classes\template\PKPTemplateManager.inc.php line 347 Function: PKPTemplateManager->fetch("article/article.tpl", Null, Null, True) File: D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\pages\article\ArticleHandler.inc.php line 226 Function: PKPTemplateManager->display("article/article.tpl") File: (unknown) line (unknown) Function: ArticleHandler->view(Array(1), Object(Request)) File: D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\lib\pkp\classes\core\PKPRouter.inc.php line 362 Function: call_user_func(Array(2), Array(1), Object(Request)) File: D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\lib\pkp\classes\core\PKPPageRouter.inc.php line 220 Function: PKPRouter->_authorizeInitializeAndCallRequest(Array(2), Object(Request), Array(1), False) File: D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\lib\pkp\classes\core\Dispatcher.inc.php line 134 Function: PKPPageRouter->route(Object(Request)) File: D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\lib\pkp\classes\core\PKPApplication.inc.php line 178 Function: Dispatcher->dispatch(Object(Request)) File: D:\Sites\OJS_at_wwwtest.ijpis.net\index.php line 65 Function: PKPApplication->execute() Server info: OS: WINNT PHP Version: 5.3.28 Apache Version: N/A DB Driver: mysql DB server version: 5.7.39-0ubuntu0.18.04.2-log
"/>

Unmet Public Expectations, Pay It Now or Pay It Later: Lessons Learned from the Colorado Benefits Management System (CBMS)

Bruce Neumann, James Gerlach, Hyo-Jeong Kim

Abstract

When a government entity outsources IT projects, consideration must be given early in the project to potential disputes and/or litigation with other parties, particularly third-party vendors, the public-at-large, and other parts of the supply chain. In this case, the State contracted for the Colorado Benefits Management System (CBMS) and the counties throughout the state were expected to deliver client services using the new system. The public expected transparency of government reporting while the State focused on accountability measures of the CBMS project. We use Agency Theory to help explain why certain public expectations were not initially met by CBMS and how some of these disconnects could have been avoided. Since the State, IT vendors, the public, and counties have different goals, risk preferences, and information needs, they used different measures to evaluate any government IT project. These mismatched measurements help explain the cause of any unmet expectations that can lead to disputes and/or litigation. We found that the State and IT vendors evaluated this IT project using more process-based accountability measures while the public and counties evaluated the project more with outcome-based measures. Therefore, we recommend that the State and IT vendors should emphasize both outcome-based and process-based measures in order to be more transparent when designing and implementing IT projects. The Colorado Benefits Management System (CBMS) provides an interesting case study showing how Agency Theory can be applied to a governmental IT project and how different measurements used by the State, IT vendors, the public, and counties contributed to the tension and turmoil experienced while implementing CBMS.

Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.